Meččyniekan Syväin - Metsästäjän Sydän

tontut animessa

森のトントたち Mori no Tonto-tachi 1984-85

とんがり帽子のメモル Tongari Boushi no Memole 1984-85

サンタ・カンパニー Santa Company 2014

ストライクウィッチーズ Strike Witches 2008-

Kauko Helavuo: Muinaissoittimet / Käsityöläismuseo, Turku (3/5) 4K • Ancient Musical Instruments, Turku, Finland

ateljé Seppo Putkinen & kni (1960s-1994) kirjatuotantoa

Suomen tunnetuimpia tiedemiehiä

kärsin piirtäjän "samat kasvot" syndroomasta joten töhertelin tiedemiehiä karikatyyrimäisesti

Finland's most famous scientists

I suffered from the draughtsman's "same face" syndrome, so I caricatured the scientists

Esko Valtaoja, Teuvo Kohonen, A.I. Virtanen, Edward Westermarck, A. E. Nordenskiöld

Mistral AI:

Explorer Adolf Erik Nordenskiöld is often considered perhaps the most iconic scientist in Finland. He was a polar explorer and the first person to sail the Northeast Passage or the northern sea route from Europe to Asia on his ship Vega in 1878–1879. Nordenskiöld was already celebrated during his lifetime in both Finland and Sweden, and he is known as one of the best-known and most respected scientists throughout Finland. His trips and scientific work have left a lasting mark on the history of Finnish and international science (yle.fi).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vega_Expedition

Another strong candidate for iconic scientist is Artturi Ilmari Virtanen, who received the Nobel prize in chemistry in 1945. Virtanen's inventions, such as AIV beef salt and AIV feed, have been significant both in Finland and in the world, and he is remembered as one of Finland's most influential and well-known scientists (paivyri.fi).

----------

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_Passage

"However, it was only in 1878-79 that Fenno-Swedish explorer Adolf Erik Nordenskiöld (born in Finland but exiled to Sweden many years before the expedition) made the first complete passage of the Northeast Passage, leading the Vega expedition from west to east. The ship's captain on this expedition was Lieutenant Louis Palander of the Swedish Royal Navy."

keräilemän päivitys

The Erotic Art of Wallace Wood
Nighte - yes
Chika - Suomi friikin päiväkirja - Japanilainen joka rakastui Suomeen
Chika - Suomi friikin päiväkirja - Kuinka päädyin sushikokiksi Helsinkiin
Mustanaamio nro 18/2002
Thorgal 2 - jäämerten saari
Kevyt Metalli
Mega-Marvel : nro5/1997 Purppurahämämäkki (Scarlet Spider)
One Piece 103-105
Ravintola maailmojen välillä 3-5 (異世界食堂 Isekai Shokudō)
The Völunga Saga vol 3

https://metsastajan-sydan.blogspot.com/2025/09/thorgal-avaimen-vartija.html

https://metsastajan-sydan.blogspot.com/2025/09/thorgal-list-finnish-edition.html

https://metsastajan-sydan.blogspot.com/2025/09/metal-hurlant-suomi.html

joiki930:【銀魂MAD】今井信女・雪、無音、窓辺にて。【セリフ入】

ISTP vs ISTP

Sougo Okita - ISTP 8w7
Nobume Imai - ISTP 9w8

other ISTPs in Gintama

Kawakami Bansai - ISTP 5w4
Gedoumaru - ISTP 8w9
Gengai Hiraga - ISTP 5w6
Nakamura Kyojiro - ISTP 6w5

Chibi Reviews: Japan's Government Bans Censorship of Anime and Manga

https://automaton-media.com/en/news/no-interference-in-creative-works-japanese-government-proposes-new-policy-for-anime-and-game-expansion-in-the-west/

MistralAI: nordic-finnish sense of justice in US system

remember skepticism

The Nordic-Finnish sense of justice is deeply rooted in values like equality, transparency, social welfare, trust in institutions, and restorative justice. These principles are central to the legal and social systems in Finland and the broader Nordic region. When considering how this sense of justice might translate—or clash—with the U.S. legal system, several key differences and potential points of friction emerge:

1. Equality vs. Hierarchy

Nordic-Finnish Approach:
- Emphasizes social equality and minimal hierarchy. The legal system aims to treat all citizens equally, with a strong focus on reducing disparities in access to justice.
- Universal welfare (e.g., healthcare, education, legal aid) ensures that socioeconomic status does not determine legal outcomes.
U.S. System:
- While equality under the law is a constitutional principle, systemic inequalities (e.g., racial disparities, wealth gaps, access to legal representation) often lead to unequal outcomes.
- The adversarial nature of the U.S. system can favor those with more resources.

Potential Clash: The Nordic ideal of equality might find the U.S. system’s reliance on private legal representation and plea bargaining as inherently unfair or biased.

2. Trust in Institutions

Nordic-Finnish Approach:
- High trust in government and legal institutions. Police and prosecutors are seen as impartial and community-oriented.
- Restorative justice is increasingly used, focusing on rehabilitation and reconciliation rather than punishment.
U.S. System:
- Trust in institutions is more variable and often lower, especially among marginalized communities.
- The system is punitive, with a focus on retribution, long prison sentences, and a large incarceration rate.

Potential Clash: The Nordic emphasis on trust and rehabilitation might view the U.S. system as overly punitive and counterproductive for societal reintegration.

3. Transparency and Open Government

Nordic-Finnish Approach:
- Open government laws (e.g., Finland’s “Everyone’s Right to Know”) ensure transparency in legal proceedings and public records.
- Decisions are often made with public input and consensus.
U.S. System:
- While transparency exists (e.g., public trials, Freedom of Information Act), there are significant exceptions (e.g., plea bargains, sealed records, corporate secrecy).
- The influence of lobbying and political donations can undermine public trust.

Potential Clash: The Nordic expectation of transparency might find the U.S. system’s opacity and influence of money in politics troubling.

4. Social Welfare and Legal Aid

Nordic-Finnish Approach:
- Legal aid is widely available, and the state ensures access to justice for all, regardless of income.
- Social welfare systems reduce the root causes of crime (e.g., poverty, lack of education).
U.S. System:
- Legal aid is limited, and public defenders are often overburdened.
- Social safety nets are weaker, and issues like poverty and healthcare access are criminalized more often.

Potential Clash: The Nordic model would likely critique the U.S. for criminalizing social issues rather than addressing them through welfare.

5. Restorative vs. Retributive Justice

Nordic-Finnish Approach:
- Focus on rehabilitation and reintegration. Prisons are designed to be humane and preparatory for return to society.
- Victim-offender mediation and community service are common alternatives to incarceration.
U.S. System:
- Emphasis on punishment and deterrence. The U.S. has the highest incarceration rate in the world.
- Restorative justice programs exist but are not mainstream.

Potential Clash: The Nordic approach might see the U.S. system as creating cycles of crime rather than breaking them.

6. Gun Laws and Public Safety

Nordic-Finnish Approach:
- Strict gun control laws and a focus on prevention and mental health support.
U.S. System:
- Gun ownership is a constitutional right, and gun violence is a major public safety issue.
- Debates over gun control are highly polarized.

Potential Clash: The Nordic emphasis on collective safety and prevention would likely find the U.S. approach to gun rights and violence prevention inadequate.

7. Police and Community Relations

Nordic-Finnish Approach:
- Police are generally unarmed or lightly armed, and use of force is rare.
- Community policing and de-escalation are prioritized.
U.S. System:
- Police are heavily armed, and use of force (including lethal force) is more common.
- Police-community relations are often strained, especially in marginalized communities.

Potential Clash: The Nordic model would likely view the militarization of U.S. police and high rates of police violence as antithetical to justice.

Key Takeaway

The Nordic-Finnish sense of justice, with its focus on equality, trust, transparency, and rehabilitation, would likely find the U.S. system too adversarial, punitive, and unequal. However, some U.S. states and cities are experimenting with Nordic-inspired reforms, such as restorative justice programs, police demilitarization, and decarceration efforts.

MistralAI: nordic-finnish vs u.s. sense of justice / superhero team-up

remember skepticism

The Nordic-Finnish and U.S. American senses of justice reflect their distinct cultural, historical, and philosophical traditions. Here’s a breakdown of how they differ—and where they might overlap:

Nordic-Finnish Sense of Justice

Core Values:

Collective Welfare: Justice is about ensuring fairness and equality for the entire community, not just individuals. The focus is on social harmony and systemic equity.
Trust in Institutions: Nordic countries (including Finland) have high trust in government, police, and social systems. Justice is seen as something delivered by transparent, efficient institutions—not vigilantes or charismatic leaders.
Pragmatism and Prevention: The goal is to prevent injustice through proactive policies (e.g., strong social welfare, education, and healthcare) rather than punitive measures.
Restorative Justice: Emphasis on rehabilitation over punishment. For example, Finland’s prison system focuses on reintegrating offenders into society, with open prisons and vocational training.

Key Traits:

Low Corruption Tolerance: Corruption is rare and heavily condemned. Public officials are expected to be accountable and transparent.
Consensus-Driven: Decisions are made through dialogue and compromise, not adversarial conflict.
Nature and Sustainability: Justice extends to environmental protection and future generations. Harming nature is seen as a moral failing.

Examples:

Finland’s universal basic education and free healthcare are seen as justice in action—ensuring everyone has equal opportunities.
The Finnish legal system prioritizes mediation and restorative justice, even for serious crimes.

U.S. Sense of Justice